There’s not nearly enough of Rampling, however. (I guess a whole movie in which Jennifer Lawrence sits in a Moscow office building pumping out anti- Hillary Clinton Twitter bots would’ve been hard to market.) ![]() This is about as close as “Red Sparrow” comes to addressing the renewed Cold War between Russia and the United States. Rampling’s character, known only as Matron, gives a speech to the class about how the West is weak, tearing itself apart with racial divisions and social media obsessions, and how it’s Russia’s time to step in and assert itself as the ultimate world power. He sends her to whore school.Ĭharlotte Rampling, the cruel and emotionless leader of the training center (it’s actually called Sparrow School), teaches Dominika and her classmates how to manipulate people by seeking out their weaknesses, using their charms and becoming whomever they must to get the assignment done. He thinks she can make herself useful to the state in order to protect her home and her mother. He’s a high-ranking member of the Russian secret intelligence agency, and he has recognized cunning and scrappiness in her since she was a child. Right on cue, her uncle Vanya (yes, Matthias Schoenaerts really plays a character named Uncle Vanya) steps in with a proposal. (It’s one of many gory moments that’ll make you flinch and cringe in your seat.)ĭominika’s career-ending leg break also means the end of her ballet-sponsored housing and medical care that her ill mother needs. But he is crucial to the on-stage accident that ends her career with a fall and a crack. The great Ukrainian dancer Sergei Polunin plays her partner sadly, he barely gets to show off his formidable abilities. It begins with promise and verve, though, as we see Dominika at the height of her powers in her former life, performing as a prima ballerina with the Bolshoi Ballet. That overall bland tone, coupled with the film’s unnecessarily long running time, makes this would-be thriller less than thrilling. She’s certainly game for it all (despite her wavering accent.) But aside from some shocking bursts of violence, he directs “Red Sparrow” with a surprisingly dull sameness. ![]() The fact that Dominika is told early on that her “body belongs to the state”-which was the case long before she started training to be a spy-makes her the object of constant leering, and that male gaze gives “Red Sparrow” a skeevy vibe from which it never deviates.ĭirector Lawrence also worked with Jennifer Lawrence (no relation) in the last three “Hunger Games” movies, so he’s familiar with putting his exceedingly capable star through the wringer. That film truly was about female empowerment-about a woman using every inch of her body to achieve her goals while also having agency over her fate. But it’s impossible to watch it without comparing it to last summer’s stylish and kinetic “ Atomic Blonde,” another physically demanding espionage thriller starring Charlize Theron. “Red Sparrow,” which Francis Lawrence directed from Justin Haythe’s script, is based on the novel by Jason Matthews. And as a solitary tool set, it wouldn’t seem to prepare her for the many dangers headed her way. What she endures is more than just degrading-it’s destructive. (Oh! She also learns how to pick locks.) Dominika is right when she complains that she’s been sent to “whore school” alongside other attractive and tough-minded young people who are being molded to serve Russia’s secret intelligence. But this is about the extent of the training she receives. Good film but not great.Surely there’s more to spycraft than knowing the perfect spot to caress on a target’s thigh, or how delicately to whisper into his ear. This could of been one of the better spy films had the film been explored, with more character focus which might have meant a longer running time. The film has a very long running time and it is mainly focused on moving from A to C without explaining B, much of this time should have been spent at the school for the Sparrows. The characters are a key example of what is wrong with modern Hollywood storytelling, they are just too thin. ![]() I'm eager to read the book as the plot of the film is a little scarce, nearly to the point of non existent. The core storyline potential is there, but the substance is not there. Francis Lawrence has a mixed bag of films and I have this right in the Constantine bag of quality. Lawrence commits fully to the role, you can see she is invested with the intensity she brings to the role and it is not here that fails the film. The film is stylish but that is where it fails, the story is full of holes and we never learn a lot about the characters involved.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |